Skip to main content

VPC per envrionvment versus Single VPC for all environments


This blog talks about the two possible ways of hosting your infrastructure in Cloud, though it will be more close to hosting on AWS as it is a real life example but this problem can be applied to any cloud infrastructure set-up. I'm just sharing my thoughts and pros & cons of both approaches but I would love to hear from the people reading this blog about their take as well what do they think.


Before jumping right away into the real talk I would like to give a bit of background on how I come up with this blog, I was working with a client in managing his cloud infrastructure where we had 4 environments dev, QA, Pre Production and Production and each environment had close to 20 instances, apart from applications instances there were some admin instances as well such as Icinga for monitoring, logstash for consolidating logs, Graphite Server to view the logs, VPN server to manage access of people.




At this point we got into a discussion that whether the current infrastructure set-up is the right one where we are having a separate VPC per environment or the ideal setup would have been a single VPC and the environments could have been separated by subnet's i.e a pair of subnet(public private) for each environment





Both approaches had some pros & cons associated with them

Single VPC set-up

Pros:

  1. You only have a single VPC to manage
  2. You can consolidate your admin app's such as Icinga, VPN server.

Cons:

  1. As you are separating your environments through subnets you need granular access control at your subnet level i.e instances in staging environment should not be allowed to talk to dev environment instances. Similarly you have to control access of people at granular level as well
  2. Scope of human error is high as all the instances will be on same VPC.

VPC per environment setup

Pros:

  1. You have a clear separation between your environments due to separate VPC's.
  2. You will have finer access control on your environment as the access rules for VPC will effectively be access rules for your environments.
  3. As an admin it gives you a clear picture of your environments and you have an option to clone you complete environment very easily.

Cons:

  1. As mentioned in pros of Single VPC setup you are at some financial loss as you would be duplicating admin application's across environments


In my opinion the decision of choosing a specific set-up largely depends on the scale of your environment if you have a small or even medium sized environment then you can have your infrastructure set-up as "All environments in single VPC", in case of large set-up I strongly believe that VPC per environment set-up is the way to go.

Let me know your thoughts and also the points in favour or against of both of these approaches.

Comments

  1. Totally Agree with you, I do follow the same things in managing our infra

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi , I liked the discussion and i have exactly similar requirement for one of my eCommerce application. Could you please share your experience about how you managed to get the setup and if possible can you please share the architectural diagram.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One of the most critical factor that should be considered for having Single or Separate VPC environment is to be able to showcase adequate auditability and ensuring that all the compliance requirements are being met.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I prefer one VPC for Dev,Staging, and Production. As your AWS infra grows, you will need Directory Services (Name Servers, User Directory, VM Directory, Lookup services etc.). If you have two VPCs, sharing the Directory Services will not be easy. Also if you need Code Repository (e.g. GitHub) or Build tools (e.g. Jenkins) having three separate VPCs for DEV, Staging and Production will make things really complicated.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Saqib. Couldn't you have a separate VPC for Code Repo and Build tools and use VPC peering to all of the other VPCs?

    ReplyDelete
  6. very poor post. as you're a pure DevOps company, we're not expecting this kind of post.
    Hoping a good,logical and technical post from you guys.

    Thanks,

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EC2 Ssh Connection Refused

When ssh: connect to host ip_address port 22 Connection refused



Unable to access server???
Exactly when you see the error - “ssh: connect to host ip_address port 22: Connection refused” while connecting your AWS EC2 Instance. In order to find solution of the problem, you will go to AWS forum and other channels where you need to answers several questions first. But it's very difficult to find the actual problem. In order to get clues what the problem is, we should provide as many details as possible about what we have tried and the results we are getting. Because there are hundreds of reason why a server or service might not be accessible, also connectivity is one of the toughest issue to diagnose, especially when you are hosting something critical on your box. I've seen several topics on this problem, but none offers a solution to it.  I was not aware for what should I look at first. So I walk through from the very basics and investigated the following thing Use of verbose while ss…

jgit-flow maven plugin to Release Java Application

Introduction As a DevOps I need a smooth way to release the java application, so I compared two maven plugin that are used to release the java application and in the end I found that Jgit-flow plugin is far better than maven-release plugin on the basis of following points: Maven-release plugin creates .backup and release.properties files to your working directory which can be committed mistakenly, when they should not be. jgit-flow maven plugin doesn't create these files or any other file in your working directory.Maven-release plugin create two tags.Maven-release plugin does a build in the prepare goal and a build in the perform goal causing tests to run 2 times but jgit-flow maven plugin builds project once so tests run only once.If something goes wrong during the maven plugin execution, It become very tough to roll it back, on the other hand jgit-flow maven plugin makes all changes into the branch and if you want to roll back just delete that branch.jgit-flow maven plugin doesn…